Boards! (What Are They Good For?)

Don’t be bored for boards!

Those big pieces of cardboard that come with the game. A lot of you stick to a single board or put very little thought into choosing one, which is perfectly understandable. But that’s all wrong and today I’ll be expanding on boards, why they’re important and how they win you games.

Now I’ve been “threatening” to do an article about game boards for a while now but I was never really happy on the word-based format of it. That was until I got my hands on the new White Dwarf last week (thanks to being a subscriber πŸ˜‰)!

After reading their new monthly column named Glory Points written by David Sanders who is the head rules writer for Warhammer Underworlds, my mind was changed. It can be considered a bit of a cop-out but that article is so amazing and accurate that anything I write currently would just be a re-worded copy. Thus for board knowledge I highly recommend buying at least the January 2019 White Dwarf for a comprehensive overview of board choice and placement as it literally goes over how I choose boards every game in my head. Not to mention this will be a regular monthly instalment meaning we’ll be getting more dedicated Games Workshop Underworlds tactics.

So with my White Dwarf spiel out-of-the-way, there is something I’ll post covered in the aforementioned article: board layouts and names!


Battlefield Configurations

Board placements can be summarised into 3 commonly seen sights. These have been defined by Games Workshop.

Wide and long are the most commonly seen choices with diagonal covering any slanted board choices. Each have their own distinct uses as well as downsides that all need to he considered.

Wide

The most common board placement choice by many in most games. It can be deceptively simple as it offers easy board access to both players and is generally favoured by aggro players. It’s also the default option for a lot of players due to just being an easy choice with not much consideration needed.

Long

This is the placement most players generally hate with the sigh that your opponent will now be sitting back drawing cards while you slowly advance up and you wouldn’t be wrong. Control players love this setup. Did you know, however, that there’s more to this than simply stalling?

A great use for this placement style is to make all 3 objective tokens within range of easy grasp if your playstyle requires a majority of objective control. Combined with canny objective token placement you can force your opponent to place the 3rd token (their 2nd) in your half by placing the 2nd token (your 1st) in their board, allowing you to place the 4th token (your 2nd) in your territory with an suboptimal choice to place the final token. Beware that this generally only works once per opponent, they usually catch on after the first time you do this!

Aggro players can use this board setup too! Honest! I use it to hamper high mobility warbands that rely on objective control or aggro play. High movement is great but not when there is no room to safely run past fighters who want to smash you good. With a net board width of 5 hexes, you can force scrums in the middle of no man’s land and slowly box your opponent in for their doom.

It’s a rarely seen board choice that sees a lot of hate. Play it. Understand it. Master it. Let it be a useful tool in your arsenal instead of a forgotten or unwanted pick.

Diagonal

What if I told you that Long wasn’t the furthest setup you can have for fighter-to-fighter? This is a common misconception and the greatest strength for diagonal boards. If you want your opponent to face a long time getting to you then this is actually the best board setup choice. The distance from furthest corner hex to furthest corner hex is longer than in Long boards.

Another great point is that you can set up the alignment so that your opponent cannot make any action phase 1 charges factoring in your warband size, movement of your opponent and their board choice. Punish them for an unintentional mistake!

This style can also be used by aggro players to create a choke point. Ideally you do this against a warband that outnumbers your’s to ensure a fair trade when the killing begins. The boxing-in effects works as in Long albeit more subtly.

Another sneaky tip is to remember you can attack through the gaps in corners with Diagonal. Edge hexes don’t block line of sight so feel free to abuse those range 2 or greater attacks. Many a time I’ve had Skritch kill from afar.


Board Names

All the boards now have official names! No longer will the same board have multiple different aliases! Stolen directly from the White Dwarf article, here are the boards and names with my input on each one.

The Mirror Well

There is one important thing I have not covered. Generally all boards can be placed in whatever manner chosen bit I feel some only excel at being placed second. For this, I call them Reaction Boards. The Mirror Well is a board I consider to fall under this category. You can place it first but I feel it works best when reacting to your opponent’s board choice (hence the term).

This is a Shadespire board from the original core set and is a great board for a multitude of playstyles. Best used either as is for a 3 to 4 fighter control warband or flipped 180 for an amazing aggro board.

Shyishian Stardial

More than just a toungetwister, the Stardial is one of my favourite boards. Another Shadespire special, this board functions well in any scenario as a solid basis for placing first or second. It also fits well with all 3 battlefield configurations. Extremely powerful for warbands with 5 or less fighters.

Katophrane’s Reliquary

The good old “aggro triangle”. Flipped 180, this board is amazing for warbands looking to get stuck in quick while supporting each other along the way. It’s also great for scoring Extreme Flanks from the start without having to move!

All warbands can use this board effectively but it’s best to use this as a reaction board so not to be punished by canny players who have a guess on how you play.

The Shattered Tower

This board is amazing. When used as a reaction board. Never place it first as it can be easily exploited by your opponent. Aggro players can use it for the top 4 starting hexes but control and hold objective players will find more use out of this when played as a reaction board.

The Arcane Nexus

Our first 3 lethal hex board as well as part of the first 2 board expansion set. Careful usage of this is required (unless you’re a Thorns of the Briar Queen player) unless you want to be killed by your own board! Ideally a control player’s dream, aggro players can use this if they have a small mod count to deter enemies foraging into your territory.

This board’s greatest strength is as a counter to Long play. Feel your opponent is control or looking to play Long ways? Throw this bad boy down. No matter what, you’ll have 3 advantageous starting hexes for getting to those cowardly enemy fighters!

The Animus Forge

Originally coined as The Forge (I was close!) this board has a great mix of blocked and lethal hexes. For the best use of this board, play it as a reaction board. It can be placed first but has the problem of being punished. Good for aggro players but great for flex players mixing aggro and control.

The Cursed Oubliette

Our first Nightvault board. The most neutral board in the game. It doesn’t truly excel in any given area but covers all bases evenly. A great all rounder. Especially great for 3 to 4 fighter warbands who want to sit in the middle of a board.

Penitent’s Throne

A very interesting boars choice with an even mix of lethal and blocked hexes. Ideally a reaction board, this is also works well as a starting board. Generally placed by control players, put an objective token between the 2 lethal hexes for extra fun.

Soul Refractor

Originally the Pyramid to me, this boards works whether placed first or second. The Soul Refractor works ideally as an anti-warband choice oddly enough. I use it to punish range 2 or greater warbands (The Farstriders) as well as to make Snirk (Zarbag’s Gitz) likely to kill himself if he dares to come to you. It even works as a counter to Long configuration although not as efficiently as the Arcane Nexus.

The Ruptured Seal

This ominous board is the second 3 lethal hex board after the Arcane Nexus. Favourable to all the main playstyles it is a very flexible board but still one I would only use as a reaction board to get maximum use out of it.


There you have it, an insight into boards and the battlefield configurations available for use. Now this is still only a brief coverage in my eyes. I’ll do a more in-depth look later but seriously read the Glory Points article as it breaks down everything clearly from boards to starting hex risks and fighter charge ranges. It’s a comprehensive read that’ll boost your player skill without the need of crits πŸ˜‰

9 thoughts on “Boards! (What Are They Good For?)

  1. Really interesting, and I will definitely pick up WD!

    I’m playing Zarbag’s Gits at the moment, and I really like the Penitent’s Throne. It works so well for having 2x adjacent Starting Hexes, as well as Edge Hexes for the inevitable Snirk catapult through the Pathways.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. So, this is something I think i had as a misconception – I had the idea (and now I think of it, I don’t know where I got it from) that for an organised play event, you had to pick a board and stick to it in the same way as picking a deck – when starting up the game you would choose which side to use. I know now that this is wrong, but I think it would be a good addition to the format – one of the things I very much like around UW is not havint to crt around a lot of stuff to events and the current format of taking 6 (or more as the game expands and evolves) boards to an event works counter to this, I think.

    Like

    1. I’ve seen this before and it would be hugely detrimental to the game if you only had 1 double sided board to choose. It’s so limiting that you’d be hurting your own chances

      Like

      1. Yeah, under the current format it seems to be a big disadvantage to do it, but in a set format where it’s a restriction on every player then it might add some extra depth to force selection (or just mean a reduction in variety – could go either way). Just pondering out loud, really.

        Like

      2. A reduction of choice for boards would remove far more depth for the game than add. Boards can be used to counter specific warbands and playstyles but I understand your thoughts

        Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s